Blog Post
Is CompTIA Security+ actually hard? A realistic look at the exam difficulty, the acronym trap, and how to prepare for your first cybersecurity certification.
Checking sign-in status...
CompTIA Security+ is widely recommended as the starting point for a cybersecurity career. It appears on job postings, government hiring requirements, and almost every "how to get into cybersecurity" article written in the last decade.
What those articles often skip is an honest account of what the exam actually demands. Security+ is described as entry-level, and that is accurate in the sense that no prior cybersecurity experience is required. It is not accurate if it leads you to expect a light exam. Most beginners who attempt it without understanding what they are walking into do not pass on the first attempt.
This guide covers what the exam tests, where candidates lose marks, and what preparation actually looks like.
Security+ is a vendor-neutral certification from CompTIA that validates baseline cybersecurity knowledge. Vendor-neutral means it is not tied to any specific platform or product. You are not learning Microsoft Defender or Cisco firewall configurations. You are learning the underlying concepts that apply regardless of which tools an organization uses.
The current version, SY0-701, was released in November 2023. It reflects a stronger focus on practical, applied skills compared to earlier versions. Multiple-choice questions still make up a significant portion of the exam, but performance-based questions, which require you to complete a task rather than select an answer, carry significant weight and are where many candidates run into difficulty.
Security+ sits at an interesting position. It is positioned as entry-level, which attracts candidates with little to no cybersecurity background. But the content it covers is broad and, in several areas, technically demanding.
The combination of wide coverage and no prerequisite experience creates a gap that most beginners do not anticipate.
The breadth problem: Security+ covers threats, vulnerabilities, cryptography, identity management, network security, cloud security, incident response, governance, and more. No single topic goes extremely deep, but the range means there is a large volume of material to understand, not memorize, before exam day.
The performance-based question problem: These questions appear at the start of the exam and cannot be skipped and returned to easily. They might ask you to configure a firewall rule, analyze a network diagram, identify a vulnerability in a given scenario, or match attack types to their descriptions in a drag-and-drop format. Candidates who have only studied passively find these questions significantly harder than the multiple-choice sections.
Related: How to Know If You're Actually Ready for the CompTIA Security+ Exam
The vocabulary problem: Cybersecurity has a dense vocabulary. Acronyms, protocol names, attack classifications, and compliance frameworks appear throughout the exam. Knowing a term exists is not the same as knowing how it works, when it applies, and how it differs from a similar term. Beginners frequently recognize terms from their reading but cannot apply them under time pressure.
👉 Learn more about CompTIA Security+
Security+ uses two main question types.
Multiple choice questions present a scenario or direct question with four answer options. Many of these are straightforward if you understand the underlying concept. Some are deliberately ambiguous, with two answers that are both technically correct but where one is more appropriate given the specific scenario details.
Performance-based questions (PBQs) are the more demanding format. Examples include:
Security Operations carries the highest weight and covers a wide range of practical tasks including incident response, log analysis, identity and access management, and endpoint security. Candidates who spend most of their time on theoretical concepts and underinvest in this domain tend to find the exam harder than expected.
Note: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations is the second highest-weighted domain and the one where performance-based questions most frequently appear. Knowing attack types in isolation is not enough. You need to be able to identify them from a described scenario and explain the appropriate response.
PBQs appear at the beginning of the exam. Many candidates spend too long on them, which compresses the time available for the multiple-choice section. A practical strategy is to work through each PBQ to your best ability without getting stuck, then move through the multiple-choice questions at a steady pace.
Preparation time depends heavily on your starting point. The estimates below assume consistent, structured study rather than occasional reading.
These timelines also assume you are completing hands-on labs or simulations, not only watching videos or reading. The performance-based questions make it very difficult to pass on theory alone.
Security+ assumes a working understanding of how networks operate. If you do not know what TCP/IP, DNS, DHCP, ports, and routing mean in practical terms, start there before opening a Security+ study guide. The CompTIA Network+ curriculum or Professor Messer's free networking materials are reasonable starting points. Trying to learn network security without understanding networks adds unnecessary difficulty.
The exam does not ask you to define a man-in-the-middle attack. It presents a scenario, describes what is happening in a network, and asks you to identify the attack type and the appropriate mitigation. Study attacks by understanding the mechanism, the conditions that make them possible, and the controls that prevent or detect them.
Most candidates practice PBQs only at the end of their preparation. This is backwards. PBQs require a different kind of thinking than multiple-choice questions, and that thinking takes time to develop. Introduce PBQ practice within the first few weeks and return to it regularly throughout your study period.
Ninety questions in 90 minutes sounds manageable until you are sitting in front of a PBQ that requires genuine analysis and a clock that does not stop. Regular timed practice sessions build the pacing instinct that prevents time from running out before you have answered every question.
ExamOS structures this well with daily 30-minute sessions that keep practice consistent without requiring long blocks of dedicated time. The Rookie mode is useful for confirming that foundational concepts are solid. Challenger mode is where the gaps surface, particularly around threat identification and security operations topics where the exam applies the most pressure. Moving to Legend mode when Challenger feels manageable gives you a reliable signal that your reasoning is close to exam-ready.
Governance, risk, and compliance topics appear in both the Security Program Management domain and throughout the exam in scenario questions. Candidates often memorize the names of frameworks (NIST, ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA) without understanding what each one governs, who it applies to, and how organizations demonstrate compliance. The exam tests the latter, not the former.
CompTIA publishes the full list of exam objectives for SY0-701 on its website at no cost. Every topic that can appear on the exam is listed there. Work through it systematically and mark topics where your understanding is weak. This prevents the common mistake of spending disproportionate time on topics you already know while neglecting ones you do not.
These are the areas where candidates most frequently lose marks, based on community feedback and exam analysis:
Network+ is not a formal prerequisite, but CompTIA recommends it. If you do not have Network+ level knowledge, you will need to acquire it through other means before your Security+ study will be effective. Attempting Security+ without a networking foundation makes an already broad exam significantly harder.
They test different things, so direct comparison is difficult. Security+ covers a broader conceptual range across a shorter exam. AZ-104 and similar cloud certifications go deeper into platform-specific configuration and operational tasks. Many candidates find Security+ harder to prepare for because the breadth is harder to fully cover, while cloud certifications are harder to pass without hands-on experience. Your background determines which feels more demanding.
Three years from the date you pass. You can renew by earning continuing education units through qualifying activities logged in CompTIA's CertMaster platform, or by passing a renewal exam before the expiry date. Unlike Microsoft certifications, Security+ does not expire and require a full retake if you maintain your continuing education.
The passing score is 750 on a scale of 100 to 900. Like most scaled certification exams, this does not correspond directly to a percentage of questions answered correctly. The scoring model accounts for question difficulty and weights questions accordingly.
Yes. Security+ is ISO 17024 accredited and ANSI accredited, which gives it international recognition. It is required or accepted by the US Department of Defense, NATO, and numerous private sector organizations globally. It is one of the more portable cybersecurity certifications available at the entry level.
It is possible but requires significantly more preparation time. The exam is designed for candidates with roughly two years of IT administration experience, according to CompTIA's own recommendation. Without that background, you are not just learning Security+ content. You are also building foundational knowledge that experienced candidates already have. Factor that into your timeline.
For anyone starting a cybersecurity career, Security+ is one of the more defensible first certifications to pursue. It is vendor-neutral, widely recognized, DoD-approved, and genuinely tests useful knowledge rather than platform familiarity.
It also serves as a credible signal to employers in a field where the barrier to claiming cybersecurity knowledge is low but the cost of hiring someone who lacks it is high. A completed Security+ tells a hiring manager that a candidate understands the domain at a functional level.
The difficulty is real, particularly for candidates without a networking or IT background. But the preparation is straightforward when approached systematically: build the foundations first, practice with performance-based questions throughout, understand concepts rather than memorizing terms, and give yourself enough time to cover the full scope of the exam objectives.
Candidates who pass Security+ are not typically those who studied the hardest in the final two weeks. They are the ones who built consistent habits over a realistic timeline and treated every practice question as information rather than a score.
👉 Top 5 cybersecurity certificationsTop
Starting your Security+ preparation? Work through the CompTIA exam objectives, build foundational networking knowledge if you need it, and use a structured practice tool like ExamOS to identify gaps before they cost you on exam day. Give yourself enough time to cover the full scope, and do not underestimate the performance-based questions.
👉 Related Links
Top 5 cybersecurity certificationsTop
Roadmap : Zero to Hero Cybersecurity Specialist
ExamOS Security Practice Exam Hub