Blog Post
AI-103 Study Guide: Microsoft Foundry, Agents, and RAG
AI-103 covers 5 domains, but Generative AI and Agentic Solutions alone is 30-35% of the exam. Here's exactly where to spend your study time and why.

Blog Post
AI-103 covers 5 domains, but Generative AI and Agentic Solutions alone is 30-35% of the exam. Here's exactly where to spend your study time and why.

Checking sign-in status...
Most AI-103 material online falls into one of two traps: a repackaged AI-102 guide with a new exam code, or a two-paragraph overview that tells you the exam exists without telling you what's on it.
AI-103 is not AI-102 renamed. It is built around Microsoft Foundry, agentic AI, and RAG, and nearly a third of the content has no AI-102 equivalent. Here is what the exam tests, in the proportions it tests them.
Quick facts: The exam contains 40 to 60 questions, lasts 120 minutes, and requires a score of 700 out of 1000 to pass. It costs $165 USD and includes an annual free renewal.
Related: Azure AI Engineer Roadmap ↗
| Domain | Weight |
|---|---|
| Generative AI and Agentic Solutions | 30-35% |
| Plan and Manage Azure AI Solutions | 25-30% |
| Computer Vision Solutions | 10-15% |
| Text Analysis Solutions | 10-15% |
| Information Extraction Solutions | 10-15% |
One domain is worth more than the other three combined. If your study plan gives all five equal time, you're underinvesting in the section that decides whether you pass.
Skip this and every later topic feels harder than it should.
Do not treat Foundry as the new portal. Treat it as an architecture you can draw from memory.
An agent is not a smarter chatbot. It runs a loop: reason → act → observe → repeat. Questions describe a requirement and ask what tools and instructions the agent needs because you are designing the loop, not recognizing it.
Know these cold:
Two orchestration patterns get tested:
Governance matters as much as capability. Agents need Azure managed identities scoped with RBAC, not inherited user credentials or shared service accounts. This is scored content, not a nice-to-have.
The exam guide references "Foundry SDKs and connectors" without naming a specific orchestration framework. Study the concepts of plugins, function-calling, and planners, not any one SDK's syntax.
A model's knowledge is frozen at training time. RAG retrieves current, relevant data at query time and grounds the response in it. This is not confined to Information Extraction; it is core to the agents domain too.
Azure AI Search, the primary retrieval engine, tests three modes:
The ingestion pipeline: Document Intelligence (OCR/layout extraction) → chunking (semantic chunking usually beats fixed-size) → enrichment → index. The exam tests the whole flow from document to agent, not retrieval in isolation.
Evaluation is where candidates lose easy points. The Azure AI Evaluation SDK checks:
A question describing a plausible-but-wrong RAG answer is testing whether you know which of these four to check first.
Azure AI Content Understanding uses LLM-based extraction (not traditional OCR) to turn documents, images, audio, and video into structured output. It shows up in three places:
If your prep materials don't mention this service, they're incomplete for this exam.
This domain represents the governance layer underneath everything else, which covers four areas:
Questions here regularly combine two of these at once — service selection plus security, or monitoring plus responsible AI. Don't study this domain as isolated bullet points.
Related: How Hard Is AI-103 ↗
These domains are individually smaller, but they collectively make up a third of the exam. Do not skip them, but do not over-invest either.
The biggest mistake is treating this like a vocabulary exam. Knowing that Azure AI Search does vector search, or that agents use tools, gets you through the easy questions. It won't get you through a scenario asking you to pick between three plausible architectures under a stated constraint (cost, latency, data sensitivity, safety).
Build these before your exam, not just read about them:
The new exam is Foundry-centric instead of using separate service endpoints. Generative AI and agents (30-35%) barely existed on AI-102. Image/video generation, Content Understanding, and agent governance are all new. Expect 40-50% new content if you're coming from AI-102.
Yes. This is a developer exam — you'll read and reason about Foundry SDK code throughout.
You need significant hands-on practice. Build a real RAG pipeline and a real multi-agent system in Foundry. Configure Content Understanding analyzers. Set up safety filters and guardrails. Scenario questions assume you have done these things.
Semantic Kernel is not named explicitly, but it is the dominant orchestration framework in this ecosystem. Study the concepts (plugins, function-calling, planners), not SDK-specific syntax.
The passing score is 700 out of 1000. The exam uses scaled scoring, so do not try to back-calculate how many questions you can miss.
Yes. You can use the integrated Microsoft Learn platform. Practice searching so that you do not waste too much time.
Want to pressure-test your understanding with scenario-based practice across all five domains? ExamOS offers the Daily Sprint, Mock Exam, and Readiness Score to build judgment for Foundry architecture, agentic solutions, and RAG design decisions.